Happy Thursday everybody!
Did you know that at one point the Vatican offered people time off purgatory for following the Pope on Twitter? Neat.
Today’s piece of buried treasure is a weird one. Rather than introduce it, I think I’m just gonna roll right into it.
I present:
The Stories we Tell Ourselves
-door
opens and closes-
-raincoat
is set on hanger-
-buzz
of lights flickering to life-
“Well, let’s just get right to it, shall we?
“I
would call myself a smart man, perhaps even a poetic one; but I’m no
genius. Still, I imagine that when someone reaches that point of
breaking the genius threshold, it must come with complete, anarchic
chaos for them internally for a time. Especially nowadays, most of
the genius ideas that draw from simplicity have to have been taken. I
mean, we won’t know until someone comes up with the next one, but
that’s beside the point. The point here is that nowadays, genius is
determined by invention or mechanical or technological innovation.
That’s right, my friends, long gone are the days where our brightest
minds generated ideas
for the betterment of their neighbors. The Enlightenment is over!
Now, genius sells for a profit to a crowd of hungry dummies; but
again, I digress.
-pacing footsteps-
“When a mind breaks into the
realm of greater intelligence, it isn’t a clean break, especially it
being their debut for that kind of prestige. No, the universe’s
workings are too messy and our proud understanding is too small for
things to go off without a hitch. This all brings us to this man, a
Dr. Dennis P. Ramchoff, a former head of retentive neuroscience and
pharmacology at Terminus Inc. Some of you may know Dr. Ramchoff for
his accredited founding of the ‘Hypothetical Yielding of Potential
Non-Occurrences’ – or H.Y.P.N.O. A drug that allows its user to,
for a time, relive as a conscious experience a personal memory; only,
under the drug’s effects allow you to act independently during the
experience, altering it however you may with your subconscious
adapting it for plausibility’s sake. It’s easy to think of it like
lucid dreaming, but with more serious consequences.”
“What
kind of consequences, sir?”
“Well memory, to perhaps a
greater degree than dreaming, is a strange thing, son.”
“How
do you mean?”
“For one, haven’t heard of too many cases in my day where folks get chemically addicted to dreaming. With HYPNO on the other hand, you can usually spot an addict. Hallucinations, delusions, long and short term memory loss, even some accounts of Alzheimer’s disease found in 30-year-old’s have been attributed to overuse.”
“Makes
you wonder if it’s worth it.”
“Mmhm,
well, when you approach it philosophically, it isn’t hard to see the
temptation. Relive any personal memory, truly relive it? We’ve all
had daydreams where we think back to a time or event we wish had gone
differently, but it’s always still abstract and strangely intangible.
Even if just inside the shelter of your own mind, it can become real
if you’ve access to the drug. At the same time, similar thinking can
illuminate the graver angle to the pill. You much of a reader, son?”
“Yes,
sir.”
“You
know who Thomas Nagle is?”
“I’m
sorry sir, but no I don’t.”
“Quite
alright, quite alright. I suggest you read him, but the short version
of what you’ll come to understand is that, truly, all you have is the
present moment and all you can be sure of is the contents of your own
mind.”
“I’m
not sure I follow.”
“Believe
me that’s fine. You see, what makes the idea of memories so strange
when you think about it comes with accepting those two things, and
that takes time. It goes something like this: you know the past
exists because your memories tell you so and because those memories
help to explain the world around you at present, sure, but since your
memories don’t exist outside your own mind, you argue yourself in a
circle trying to confirm that they exist externally. You know those
events happened and exist separately from you because you remember
it, but using what’s in your mind to prove what has happened outside
your mind, you get nowhere. And if the present moment is all that
exists, then your memory is an unprovable record of something that
doesn’t exist, but is still relied upon day-to-day. Any better?”
“I
think a little, go on.”
“Excellent.
Well, that’s where HYPNO comes into play and can make a world of
trouble. When you use the drug relive a memory alternatively and
create that experience, to the user it still creates a new, valid
memory of that experience. All you have is the present to draw
connections as to which one is authentic. For example, four years ago
you were at a social engagement where you became intimate with the
woman who is now your significant other, and without that occurrence,
the two of you may never have gotten acquainted on that level. Say
that you use HYPNO to relive that event and become intimate with a
different individual at that same event, some fantasy you wanted to
live out. When the drug wheres off, you now have two valid memories
of the same event that have drastically different endings, yet you
may be comfortably certain of which occurred in reality when you find
yourself still romantically engaged with the first woman and not the
second.”
“Even
that small example seems dangerously confusing.”
“And
that’s just the beginning. If one should generate enough memories
through the substance that their mental space gets cluttered it can
become extremely difficult, nigh impossible, to separate earthly
history from your own because to you it’s all real.”
“Why
not keep records? Notes to yourself as to which memories are the real
ones?”
“Seems a little obvious, don’t you think? It isn’t that people tried, but simply put: doubt kills it. It can begin simply enough to separate two memories by using notes or physical reminders. But should those reminders be misplaced, lost, destroyed, or, even more sinister, tampered with, what then? Or should the idea enter your mind that the anchor you’ve left yourself was itself a misremembering, suddenly you can’t trust your own evidence. It’s doubly true if the duplicated experience was of an event in the distant past; the alternative remains fresher in your mind than the original, easier to trust as a result. These possibilities are all under the law of the mind-body problem; to attempt proving external reality via internal evidence gets you no traction whatsoever.
-beat-
“You’re
being quiet.”
“Yes,
I’m sorry. It’s just a lot to consider.”
“Mmmhm,
making genius doesn’t give the pleasure of a clean break, as I said.
Something always gets overlooked with something this revolutionary
and something so inchoate as our understanding of consciousness.
Isn’t that right, Dennis?”
“Excuse
me?”
“When
an addict should create so many alternative experiences that
authentic, natural memories are lost, where does identity lie in all
of that?”
“What did you say?”
“Personhood
remains as immeasurable as it ever has been, but our past thoughts,
decisions, and actions are what help the ego shape it. What should
happen to that system if a mind becomes so muddled in a quagmire of
fabricated experiences indistinguishable from reality?”
“I’m
speaking to you!”
“Near
as we can tell, and what the practical man will tell you, as the mind
dreams we consciously experience it delving into itself while the
body sleeps. Whether this is the case or whether dreams are the
self’s recess from a mortal casing is ultimately uncertain.
Regardless of which explanation you prefer, it is, in the end, a
conscious experience that is only shown perspective up waking.”
“Let
me out of here!”
“After
years of addictive use, fabricated memories being compiled and
compiled atop those of an earthly history but all of them real to the
mind in which they reside, attempts at keeping authenticating records
having long since failed, allow me to ask: where are you right now?”
“I
said for you to let me go.”
“And
I asked you a very simple question. I will resort to harsher methods
if pushed, Mr. Ramchoff.”
-a
drawer opens-
-something
heavy is set on the table-
“Where
are you right now?”
“Being
held in your classroom.”
“Yes,
and why is that?”
“I
don’t know.”
“Don’t
you? What is the date today?”
“I
don’t know!”
“Come
now, think. I’ll give you a hint: it’s mid-November. Hmm, anything?
Anything at all? I asked you a question, Dennis.”
“November
eighteenth, two-thousand twenty-five.”
“Mmhm,
and what makes that particular day special?”
“It’s
the day I got the idea that started HYPNO.”
“Yes.
Bright young man striding toward an equally bright future in
biochemistry. How, oh, how did you find yourself in an introductory
philosophy class?”
“Why
are you doing this?”
“We’ve
been over this, the subconscious adapts according to the user’s
actions. So, tell me, why am I here? Hmm, tell me. Come on, speak
up.”
“Because
you gave me the idea.”
“Good.”
“I
was looking out that window while you lectured about ontology. I
wasn’t ignoring you, just listening and thinking.”
“What
about?”
“The
park across the road.”
“Doesn’t
sound like listening.”
“I
was remembering a time Fiona and I were at a park that looked a lot
like that one. We’d just met a few weeks prior and it was the spot we
shared our first kiss.”
“Very
sweet.”
“The
point was I was remembering
it. It may have been your lecture, but I started contemplating the
existence of my memory of that moment, most everything you said
earlier; how it was something unique to my own mind, something no one
else had. The further away in time the moment got, the more the
dreams of it faded and the more I wanted to hold onto it.”
“I’ll
bet you never imagined what HYPNO would do.”
“It
was a selfish design over a selfish want.”
“You
open the world to something of that caliber before it’s ready and you
sunder it. Political corruption more chaotic than ever it was before,
with false memory claims being slung this way and that, seizures and
strokes spiking in audiences of all ages of the unprepared, and an
almost complete dissolution of the study of history. My boy, when you
sever a people’s connection to its past overnight, you stir a typhoon
of their present.”
“You’d
mentioned once an old religious saying: ‘You can’t step into the same
river even once’. Of course going to mean that the river is truly
ever-changing, completely fluid, never exactly in one instant is it
the same form; and the human experience is no different, right?”
“You’re
certainly not the same man you were when you came here. Guilty
conscience looking for where you went wrong?”
“It’s
odd…startling…to look back and realize it was altogether a
different person in that seat. If our selves are defined by our
memories, asking who
we are is unanswerable. What,
then, does that make us? Stories?”
“Now you’re getting it.”
FIN
The Take: This one’s from early 2016 and I guess I was feeling really, really, really philosophical at the time and if I remember right, the title comes straight out of a quote from Assassin’s Creed: Revelations. The result wound up being a pretty dense brick of text with a fun idea attached. While the construction was clunky and the idea of H.Y.P.N.O. was basically just super lucid dreaming in a pill, it was fun to come up with the acronym and think of the consequences stemming from something like it.
Anyway, that was fun. See ya Tuesday!
…
Interested in more? Like knee-slappers and chin-scratchers? Check out my first published work in the Third Flatiron’s “Hidden Histories” anthology here:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07PRN5ZQ1
Today’s FableFact source:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jul/16/vatican-indulgences-pope-francis-tweets